This just in>>> Rapport will be hosting a party at the VAR Convention in Sept! More details will follow, but you can check out VAR’s site for more info about the convention. You can’t find a better way to build your statewide referral network and learn some cool stuff at the same time!
www.VARconvention.com
Rapport will be renting a bus and travelling to the convention en masse. If you are interested in joinng the caravan please contact Carter Snipes at cartersnipes@gmail.com
Posted by Carter Snipes on May 30th, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0)
When: May 12, 2008
Where: Holiday Inn Select - Koger South Conference Center
Cost: $125 for Appraisal Institute Members / $150 for Realtor Members (includes CE credit and lunch)
Attention Brokers: Virginia is now requiring all active brokers whose licenses expire after 6/30/08 to complete 24 hours of CE within their current two year license term. Of the 24 hours of CE required, 8 hours must be Elective Real Estate Related Subjects. The Local Cost Seminar satisfies 7 hours of Elective Real Estate Related Subjects for the broker’s RE CE.
The Local Cost Seminar, to be hosted on May 12, 2008 by the Virginia Commonwealth Chapter of the Appraisal Institute (VCCAI), will provide real estate professionals: appraisers, assessors, brokers, salespeople and lenders a better understanding of development, and the costs associated with residential and commercial construction, as well as redevelopment and condominium conversion. The registrants will be exposed to the tools they need to better understand the aspects of new construction, and in turn be able to explain the aspects of new construction to their clients. Further, they will gain an understanding of how to compare new construction properties more accurately and competitively for listing, selling, lending and valuation purposes. In summary, the goal of this 7 hour seminar is to expand the registrant’s knowledge base on the cost aspects of the various types of construction in the Richmond market area, therefore increasing the registrant’s level of competency and professionalism in service to the Commonwealth of Virginia and the citizens that require their services.
The program welcomes several well known and highly respected local speakers.
Mr. Allen Dorin: Virginia Commonwealth Chapter of the Appraisal Institute (VCCAI) Immediate Past President—Introduction
Mr. Scott Shaheen: Richmond Association of Realtors (RAR) 2008 President—Current Residential Market Trends in Richmond
Mr. Scott Schaffer: Main Street Homes—Residential Development Costs
Mr. Tripp Hines: Main Street Homes—Residential Single Family Detached Homes
Mr. Mark Damico: McKinney & Co., USA—Commercial Construction
Mr. Rett Turner: Virginia Commonwealth Chapter of the Appraisal Institute (VCCAI) Associates Guidance Chair - Introduction
Mr. Jim Walker: J.R. Walker & Co., Inc.—Custom New Single Family Housing Costs
Mr. Chris Johnson: Monument Construction, LLC— Condo Renovation, Redevelopment & Conversion Costs
Mr. Chad Joyce: Ryan Homes—New Construction Townhouses & Single Family Homes
Mr. Leon Shadowen: Brandywine Realty Trust —Commercial & Residential Development, Construction, Leasing Costs
To register online for this event paying with a credit card, please use this link: www.appraisalinstitute.org/education/VirginiaCommonwlth.aspx
To register for this event paying with a check, and to register three or more people using either method of payment, please print the attached registration form and mail or fax it to Karie Walker at the chapter office:
VCCAI
2500 Grenoble Road
Richmond, VA. 23294
804.377.0940
vaappraisalinstitute@cavtel.net
Posted by Matt Barber on April 28th, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0)
Come Downtown and Take in the Views from the Penthouse at Emrick Flats this Friday!!!! This innovative new urban loft development features creative spaces with industrial stylings which create the perfect downtown environment. Our party will be in the penthouse with its wrap-around deck that features sweeping views of Richmond. Come check out the limited inventory in one of downtown’s hottest projects.

101 Marshall Street | Broad Street Arts District
Friday | May 2nd | 5-8pm
OPEN BAR & Catering Sponsored by HomeLand Title
Posted by Carter Snipes on April 28th, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Thursday, March 20th, 2008
Gumenick Properties Presents….
Monument Square Rocks
w/ Rapport
4:30-7pm | Party under the Tent (Rain or Shine!)
Entertainment | Appetizers | Libations
Location: 5200 Block of Monument Ave (near Willow Lawn)
Tickets: $5 if RSVP before 3/19 | $7 at the door
*All Proceeds will benefit our upcoming “Monte Carlo Night” Charity
Gala for Elder Homes. Stay Tuned.
Send rsvp to richmondrapport@gmail.com
The mission of RAPPORT is to foster professional development within the Richmond real estate community by bringing fellow professionals together to meet, share ideas and build relationships. Also, we will seek to engage in charitable and community oriented activites and programs to better enhance our industry’s visability and overall image.
Join our mailing list at www.RichmondRapport.com or by emailing RichmondRapport@gmail.com
CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS
We need your help to staff “Affordable Housing Awareness Week: April 20-26, 2008″
Register Today To Lend A Helping Hand! www.AffordableHousingRichmond.com
If you would like to volunteer with the Rapport Team email Rett Turner at rturner@petcorea.com
CALL FOR COMMITEE CHAIRS
If you would like to Chair a Rapport committee for the 2008 term please
send an email to richmondrapport@gmail.com with “Committee” in the subject.
We will be having a Board meeting in April.
Posted by Carter Snipes on March 17th, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0)
Here are a few construction leads in Henrico County.
9500 West Broad; former Haynes car sales; future 7-Eleven with gas?
7204 Brook Road; vacant shopping center outparcel; future Advanced Auto Parts?
3312 Skipwith Road; single-family home; future Greek restaurant?
11351 Nuckols Road; current Food Lion; future Bloom?
10010 West Broad Street; surplus land; future Touchfree Carwash?
Posted by Matt Barber on March 14th, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0)
The most recent indicator that the Richmond and Charlottesville markets are becoming closer in proximity to one another is the announcement that Goochland County is promoting infrastructure development at the Oilville interchange at I-64. Located approximately 10 miles west of Short Pump, the Oilville interchange is a typical highway commercial node with a couple of gas stations and minimal fast food. It should be noted that there is a multi-tenant commercial building at the interchange as well which houses the Grey Bear Grill and Thompson Builders among others. While Oilville is 40+ miles east of Pantops Mountain (typically thought of as the easternmost I-64 gateway to Charlottesville), it is only 30 miles east of Zion Crossroads which is quickly becoming a large bedroom community for Charlottesville. In many peoples minds, Richmond and Charlottesville are an hour from one another. From certain real estate perspectives, they’re now 30-45 minutes apart. Growth at the interchanges between the two will likely string the MSAs closer and closer together.
Posted by Matt Barber on March 5th, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0)
Mark Zandi is the Chief Economist at Moodys.com and one of the headline presenters at the VCU Real Estate Trends conference. I wrote about him last October. Speaking at the Reuter’s Housing Summit in NYC this week, he gets down to brass tacks regarding forclosures and the recession.
“Three months ago, I expected the economy to skirt a recession. Now, I expect it to suffer a recession (in the) first half of 2008,” he said.
Zandi expects the Federal Reserve to slash the federal funds rate, currently at 3 percent, by another percentage point this year.
He expects home sales to hit bottom this spring, housing starts to reach a nadir this summer, and house prices to trough in the spring of 2009.
Posted by Matt Barber on February 21st, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0)
I recently corresponded with a land broker from Richmond named Shields Jett. After checking out his website (http://ww2.jettlandandrealty.com/) and blog (http://jettlandandrealty.blogspot.com/), I thought I’d do a quick supply-side survey of large acreage land tracts in Louisa and Fluvanna counties…the main buffer counties between Richmond and Charlottesville. Here’s what I came up with. This is by no means exhaustive, but I’m confident that it covers 90% to 95% of the available acreage tracts. I have not tracked supply-side data over time, but my gut tells me that there is more land on the market now than in the last few years.

Posted by Matt Barber on February 19th, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0)
I attended the Shockoe neighborhood meeting last night at Main Street Station. The point was to discuss the Downtown Master Plan as it relates to the Slip and the Bottom. Overall, very little of substance was said. It really seemed more like a formality than anything. Hopefully some of the concerned residents and business owners had some success in the face-to-face “open house” after the meeting. What was frustrating for me was that many of the attendees spoke up about blight from undeveloped infill sites in the Bottom. They asked what the City was doing to get these surface parking lots developed. The City didn’t have much to say about it. They mentioned that there was no tax incentive for new construction. What was frustrating though was that the moderator didn’t inform the attendees about the infill development in the pipeline. All Mr. Hardin had to do to put these people at ease was to mention the two or three proposed new construction projects which are SUBSTANTIAL. I’m sure countless other proposals have been discussed recently as well. Frankly though, as I drive or walk around the Bottom, I’m more put off by the blight caused by vacant buildings than surface lots. I would be happy for the market to take its time with the unimproved sites if the plethora of buildings with boarded up windows were rehabbed. Just my $0.02.
Posted by Matt Barber on February 8th, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (2)
I attended the Tranzon auction of nearly a city block across from the Maggie Walker Governor’s School today. There were several heavy hitters at the auction including representatives from RAMZ. I’m not sure who the high bidder was, but I walked out as it was being wrapped up at $500,000 for the 1.3-acre site, not including the 10% buyer’s premium. The logical buyer is the school, but the site is in proximity to VCU and Virginia Union as well.
Posted by Matt Barber on January 31st, 2008 | Permalink | Comment (1)
On behalf of the Virginia Commonwealth Chapter of the Appraisal Institute, Rapport is pleased to announce a new real estate course offered on February 19-20, 2008. Designed for participants with introductory experience and understanding of fundamental concepts of appraising, it focuses on the valuation of vacant land parcels and the development of the cost approach. Develop your skills by creating a current cost estimate using market extraction, interview techniques, and information provided by professional cost data sources. An in-depth case study takes you from the origin of the appraisal assignment to a final value estimate using various cost approach applications.
To register online, please use the following link: http://www.appraisalinstitute.org/education/more_info.aspx?id=8289
To register with a check, please contact the chapter office at 804.377.0940 or vaappraisalinstitute@cavtel.net
Posted by Matt Barber on January 26th, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0)
Richmond Rapport is proud to announce two events on January 24, 2008. The Virginia Commonwealth Chapter of the Appraisal Institute has invited all Rapport members to a 4-hour seminar (1pm - 5pm) entitled “Analyzing Distressed Real Estate”. It will be taught by Steve Noble, MAI, SRA and held at the Sheraton Richmond West Hotel (6624 West Broad Street). The cost is $25 and includes lunch which is served from 11:30am to 1pm. This is a brand new seminar offered by the Appraisal Institute. It may qualify for Continuing Education for real estate salespersons. Materials must be ordered by January 15, so please respond promptly if you’re interested.
To register with a credit card, please use the following link: http://www.appraisalinstitute.org/education/VirginiaCommonwealth.aspx
Questions? Please contact Karie Walker at the chapter office: 804.377.0940 or vaappraisalinstitute@cavtel.net
Following the seminar, Rob Moss with Virginia Realty and Relocation is hosting a real estate social with live jazz, cocktails, and appetizers. Please click on the invitation below for details.

Posted by Matt Barber on January 14th, 2008 | Permalink | Comment (1)
I can’t find the Moody’s report, but www.financialweek.com reports today that Moody’s ranked Richmond, Virginia behind NYC, LA, Oklahoma City, and Honolulu in their list of top five cities for commercial real estate investors.
Posted by Matt Barber on January 8th, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0)
This post is a little late, but thanks to the Richmond real estate professionals who volunteered on behalf of Rapport last month. Together we performed 30 hours of volunteer work at a time of year when the SPCA employees were hungry for support.




Posted by Matt Barber on January 3rd, 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0)
Today’s RTD brought two developments to the forefront once again. I’m not going to give my $0.02 on them, but I’d love to hear from others.
Henrico
Richmond
Posted by Matt Barber on December 20th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
Carol Hazard covers the redevelopment of the former Rentokil woodpreserving site at the northwest corner of Parham Road and Ackley Avenue in Henrico County. County records do not show a transfer of the property as of yet, so it’s unclear exactly which portions of the property are included in the redevelopment. POD 78-07 is available for public viewing on the Henrico County website. The POD indicates that 12 office/warehouse buildings are to be constructed on a 12.197-acre site, with a GBA not to exceed 110,000 square feet. The RTD article focuses primarily on the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) aspect of the proposed development, which basicall means that the buildings will be constructed to strict environmental standards. Perhaps this is an attempt to offset the potential marketability of the project due to the Superfund site across the street. Whatever the reason, kudos to Empire Development of Virginia Beach for tackling the site and the superior design controls.
Background
Portions of the property (which totals roughly 37 acres) were used as a creosote wood treatment facility between 1956 and 1990. Chemicals and compounds used to preserve wood included mineral spirits, No. 2 fuel oil, chromium zinc arsenate, copper chromated arsenate, creosote, pentachlorophenol, xylene, and fire retardant. Contamination of the area occurred through the drip-drying process whereby freshly treated wood dripped into the soil in the open areas of the site. Furthermore, in 1976-1977, approximately 1,100 to 1,400 pounds of copper chromated arsenate were dumped into a pit in the northeast portion of the site. A summary time line for the site is as follows:
1956 - The first wood treatment structure was installed.
1989 - The site was placed on the EPA’s National Priorities List.
1990 - All wood treatment operations ceased.
1998 - Remediation commenced (removal and off-site storage of contaminated soils and construction of concrete containment structures)
1999 - Remediation was completed at an estimated cost of $10,907,000.
2003 - A 5-year review was completed, giving the site a relatively satisfactory status.
2008 - A 10-year review is scheduled.
Much of the Rentokil property must remain undisturbed indefinitely, as illustrated in the conceptual plan in the RTD article (print version only). Without knowing the details of the sale of the property, I applaud the developer for rolling the dice on what may or may not be risky project due to environmental issues. It seems though, that in this day and age, and in our market, even the nastiest enviromental issues are actually non-issues. Maybe you’ve heard of a little development under construction in Henrico’s East End…White Oak Village? The former Lucent Technologies site was used for storage of chlorinated solvents until 1989 which contaminated the groundwater. In 1991, the EPA issued a Record of Decision requiring a groundwater remediation system which has been operational since 1995. The property was sold to Viasystems Technologies Corporation in 1996, but Lucent (later called Agere Systems, Inc.) retained all remediation responsibility. There reportedly was little interest in the site after cleanup began. As we all are aware, the site is now under construction with one of Richmond’s most abitious mixed-use developments - White Oak Village.
On a final note, I have spoken with numerous developers, lenders, and business owners about the impact (on value) to real estate in proximity to contaminated sites. The overwhelming response is that it isn’t an issue. I realize that anecdotal evidence is a poor tool in deciding the feasibility of a development. In the Richmond MSA though, there isn’t exactly a large amount of real estate activity around contaminated sites from which to glean useful analytical information. So if you’re considering buying one of these proposed “green” office/warehouse buildings in Henrico, you should think more about the positive aspects of the project: Henrico County business-friendly environment, LEED construction standards, convenient access, etc., and less about the history of the surrounding property.
Posted by Matt Barber on December 16th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
I mentioned an interesting sale a couple of months ago. Although I think my source was ignorant of the purchaser’s plans, it turns out I was given incomplete information. Greg Gilligan covered a proposed mixed-use development at the corner of Belvidere and West Grace in this RTD article. Talk about maximizing site utility!!! Congratulations are premature for Mr. Uphoff, but I sure hope he gets approval. I wonder if he is aware of a high-end gas station/c-store/cafe/bistro just up the road in C-ville?
Posted by Matt Barber on December 14th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (4)
Thanks to everyone for making the luncheon a hit today at the Richmond Association of Realtors. We had a great turnout and excellent participation. Thanks to our panelists Pat Turner, Janice Taylor, Charlie Polk, and Monica Dirom. Also, thanks to Union Bank & Trust and BlackFinn for sponsorship. Lastly, thanks to RAR for hosting the event. We will surely have more of these.


(Panelists) (Participants)
Posted by Matt Barber on December 7th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
I can’t help wonder whether other Metropolitan areas suffer from the same lack of information as Richmond. Specifcally, we are inundated by bad news from both residential and commercial real estate fronts. Our local paper publishes no fewer than 3 articles per week on the subject…albeit 99% residentially slanted. I admit that the articles by locals usually acknowledge that Richmond is suffering far less than the rest of the country, but I have to wonder why commercial real estate in Richmond is simply ignored. Using Yahoo’s and Google’s news aggregators, I read countless articles everyday about how the sky is falling in the real estate universe. Just now I read: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/b38090dc-a10c-11dc-9f34-0000779fd2ac.html. I would say that nearly EVERY article about the state of affairs in the commercial real estate industry deals with securitzed sales. That is, when journalists spew information at us about this and that, they gather it from national real estate investment firms, Wall Street, etc.
I have to ask though: HOW DOES THIS INFORMATION APPLY TO RICHMOND? How much of our commercial real estate market falls into the “securitized” arena? I submit that it’s a miniscule amount. That brings me back to the original point of this post: WHERE IS THE USEFUL INFORMATION? The public should be informed about how OUR markets are doing. I guarantee you the statistics on Richmond’s commercial real estate market bears little resemblance to what we’re hearing about the nation in general.
Update: http://www.virginiabusiness.com/edit/magazine/yr2007/dec07/cover.shtml
While there are pockets where commercial construction has slowed such as the Dulles corridor in Northern Virginia, overall commercial construction in Virginia remains healthy, says Steven Vermillion, chief executive officer of the Associated General Contractors of Virginia. Construction employment in Virginia in August was 252,300, which is not only 2 percent higher than last year, but Vermillion believes it is an all-time high for the state. “While much of what you read about the impact of the credit crunch on construction is negative, this is definitely not the case for commercial construction,” he adds. Projects recently breaking ground include the 360-acre One Loudoun, a 3-million-square-foot mixed-used project in Loudoun County, and a 1.3 million-square-foot industrial park in Suffolk. One key driver for the commercial real estate market is federal, state and local government agencies. “A good portion of commercial construction is with government entities for projects like schools, highways and sewage treatment plants, which aren’t as susceptible to credit issues as residential construction,” says Vermillion.
Posted by Matt Barber on December 2nd, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (5)
Having grown up in Henrico’s West End, I never got to know the village of Chester. I’m doing quite a bit of work there at the moment, and I find it rather interesting.
The village of Chester is noted for its historic charm and having a strong sense of community. Chester has at least 17 active neighborhood associations which communicate frequently with each other to promote responsible development in the neighborhod. The 2006 population is estimated at 22,700, resulting from a 2.7% annual growth rate since 2000. The quaint village atmosphere is being perpetuated by developments such as Chester Village Green ( www.chestervillagegreen.com), a cutting-edge New Urbanism project in the heart of town.Slightly outside of the village boundary is the proposed Branner Station (www.brannerstation.com). In September 2007 the Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors approved 2-1 a rezoning request from HHHunt to rezone 1,614 acres southeast of Chester along the west line of Branders Bridge Road, south of Bradley Bridge Road. Yes, the vote was 2-1 in favor of approval. The current plan is for 2,449 single-family homes, 1,331 condos and townhomes, 908 apartment units, and 300 assisted living units, as well as 470,000 square feet of proposed commercial space. To accommodate this growth, the plan proffers over 100 acres for a new elementary school and a new high school. The proposed development indicates a ”North/South Pkwy Extended” which will intersect Route 10 just steps from the village periphery, at the location of the former CSX railroad right-of-way (now a greenway).
So what’s the point of this post? I just find that the village of Chester is notable because it has managed to maintain its “throwback” identity in the face of development/sprawl. As much as I respect HHHunt, it looks like the old-time charm of Chester is facing an identity crisis.
Posted by Matt Barber on December 2nd, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
The new Master Plan and Mr. Crupi’s report has a ton of information, most of which is unfortunately generic, high-level filler. So at random I decided to check out two “Concept Maps”, the Western Downtown and the Manchester Area maps. I appraise quite a bit of property on and around the VCU Campus, so I should know what’s going on. Also, I appraised nearly the entire Old Manchester area several years ago. So what strikes me as odd from these “Concept Maps”, is that they even exist. VCU is a real estate development juggernaut. They have their own Master Plan for their Monroe Campus and believe me…if they want to implement it, they will. Did tax dollars pay for Dover, Kohl & Partners to analyze and update VCU’s work? I don’t get it. The same thing goes for Old Manchester. Two private developers bought the entire neighborhood and have undoubtedly spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on engineering, architectural, and other concpet work. So did Dover, Kohl & Partners gain access to Robin Miller’s private work? Perhaps, but I doubt it. Anyway, I know master planning is critical, but I have to believe that in these two major areas of the City, a Master Plan or concept plan has no teeth.
More later…
Posted by Matt Barber on November 28th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
I read an op-ed recently in the Richmond Times Dispatch from someone wondering why builders don’t build “affordable” housing in the $50k - $150k range anymore. Fair question…allow me to give my admittedly simplistic $0.02 to “Mr. Affordable”’s question. The first thing that Mr. Affordable needs to understand is that builders often subscribe to the “1/4″ rule, which suggests that roughly one quarter of the builder’s costs for the home-lot package is allocated to the purchase of the lot. Forget the homebuilder’s profit for a moment, but let’s say that a builder offers a home for $50,000 today. What can he afford to pay for the lot? No more than $12,500. I challenge ANYONE to find such an animal in the Richmond MSA today. In case Mr. Affordable questions why such a lot doesn’t exist, let me offer this: proffers. As you can see, nearly every municipality in proximity to Richmond has proffers which exceed $12,500. What this means is that when a developer requests to rezone land to develop residential lots, they pay a cash proffer which must be factored into the development costs and/or passed on to the builder. So let’s say Developer A purchases 50 acres for $1,000,000 in Hanover or Chesterfield or wherever. They get the land rezoned to allow for 100 lots, but must proffer $15,000 per lot for the rezoning. So already the acquisition and development costs are up to $35,000 per lot. Then comes the engineering, hookups for water and sewer, construction costs, etc. Developer A might get away with hard and soft development costs of $20,000 per lot, but probably something closer to $40,000 per lot. So now we’re up to roughly $55,000 per lot in acquisition and development costs for the developer, which is the BREAK EVEN point, i.e, $0 profit. Factor in a minimum of 25% profit for the developer, and you’re up to $68,750 per lot for the builder. Referring back to our trusty “1/4″ rule, what can the builder afford to offer to the consumer? A $275,000 home.
So why can’t a developer deliver an “affordable” lot in municipalities with low or no cash proffers? Basically, because of the aforementioned acquisition and development costs. The cost of land differs from area to area. So let’s back into what a developer can afford. In the areas where land is most affordable, public/municipal water and sewer are not available. So developers are tasked with creating lots with private/individual wells and septic systems. While the developer doesn’t usually pay for such infrastructure, the builder certainly does. Guess what it costs to install a well? $3,000. A septic system? $4,000. So we’re up to $7,000 already just for the well and septic for a home. If a developer could find some really cheap land in our area for say….$4,000 per acre, they might get 40 homes on 100 acres if the land is really, really good. So for the land acquisition, the engineering, the soils testing, the legal work, the road construction, etc., the developer is up to roughly $25,000 per lot in acquisition and development costs. Add in a reasonable profit….$31,250 per lot. So the developer in this scenario cannot sell the lot to the builder for less than $31,250 per lot (again, such a price point does not exist in the Richmond MSA, or C-ville MSA to my knowledge). The lot though, is not ready for a home. The builder must then fork out the $7,000 for the well and septic systems. So the builder is already up to $38,250 per lot which I assure you is A STEAL in today’s market. You just won’t find lots in that ballpark. So in this extremely conservative scenario, the builder is faced with $38,250 per lot. What can he build and make a profit? A $153,000 home, which is out of Mr. Affordable’s price range.
I hope this diatribe has been informative to Mr. Affordable and to those of you who wonder why “affordable” homes aren’t being built today.
Posted by Matt Barber on November 23rd, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (3)
I surprised my wife for her 30th birthday yesterday by taking her (and 15 others) to Richmond’s newest wine shop/cafe/bar/restaurant — Barrel Thief Wine. This place is so much fun. Clearly I’m not alone in this either. Owned an operated by two young guys who have been best friends since childhood, Barrel Thief offers an excellent concept which fuses a retail wine shop with a cafe/bistro/bar atmosphere. Oh, they know their wine too, so prepare to be educated if you so choose. Chef Joe put together a delicious appetizer sampler to soak up the 10 or so bottles that we bought. The entire staff showed us a really good time. The owners, Ross and Ned, were extremely accommodating, and enjoyed hanging out with us. My only regret is that our party had been going on for about 5 hours prior to the wine sampling, so we definitely didn’t appreciate it as we should have. We’ll be back.
What does this have to do with real estate? Nothing.
Posted by Matt Barber on November 18th, 2007 | Permalink | Comment (1)
2008 dates for the Appraisal Institute’s new conservation easement course (Valuation of Conservation Easements)have been set. Richmond is fortunate enough to be one of the seven cities in the country to host the AI course. If you or anyone you know is considering a conservation easement, you should ask your appraiser if they’ve earned this certificate. If they haven’t heard of it, you should look elsewhere.
Posted by Matt Barber on November 17th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
The National Association of Realtors approached the Appriasal Institute in early 2007 to explore affiliation opportunities. The AI Executive Committee formed a project team which continues to meet with NAR on the subject. I think this would be a great idea. Frankly, I don’t know what there is to think about.
Posted by Matt Barber on November 17th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
Talk about a public-private partnership…man. As reported in this RTD article, Chesterfield County and the owners of the remaining 46 acres comprising the (former) Cloverleaf Mall have reached an agreement for sale. The total price will be $16.5 million for the 83 acres ($198,795 per acre) which the County will pay, and be reimbursed by NC-based developer Crosland, Inc. The tentative plan of development calls for 750 residences and 200,000-300,000 square feet of commercial space. Forget the commercial space for a moment…the density indicates a purchase price of $22,000 per unit. Clearly Crosland has some flexibility here. I doubt the location is conducive for $750k+ homes, but again, with such a low $/lot basis, these guys should be set. Plus, the County is talking about a CDA, which only sweetens the deal. Throw in 200,000 worth of commercial space, and it’s GOT to be a home run.
Posted by Matt Barber on November 13th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
For those of you who don’t read Ken Harney’s weekly column, you need to. His latest article focuses on lenders and (residential) appraisers and the damage that they can do to our economy. Specifically, it cites a lawsuit brought against an appraisal “brokerage” service which essentially connects appraisers with lenders. The suit alleges that a large, national lender pressured the appraisal firm to select appraisers who were reportedly williing to inflate property values to allow sales/loans to go through. This is a macro example of a problem that occurs daily throughout our Richmond communities. For the record, I’m a commercial appraiser, as is my father who has been in the business for nearly 30 years. We have had no such pressure since I’ve been in the business (4 years), and very little since my father has been around. That said, it is RAMPANT in the residential sector. I moved (back) to Richmond in May. The home-buying process wasn’t horrible, but I wouldn’t do it regularly. Being an appraiser, I was pleased when my lender said they had chosen the best residential firm (P.E. Turner & Co.) in Richmond. It turned out that this firm actually appraised my home when it transferred last (in 2005 I think). Anyway, I was confident that they would conclude a value estimate that was fair and accurate. When the number came in $6,000 below the contract price, I was surprised, but satisfied nonetheless. Perhaps it was because I’m an appraiser, and I knew of the quality of the appraisal firm valuing my future home, but I knew that they got it right. When I told the selling agent of the results, he was very upset, and immediately suggested that we hire a second appraiser, presumably one who would put a higher value on the property. I’m not an expert on realtor/salesperson ethics, but I imagine that this agent did nothing wrong is making that suggestion/request. Of course we did not comply, and we purchased the house at the appraised value. The point is that this scenario happens everyday, in every market. It’s not nearly as severe or harmful as the lawsuit cited by Mr. Harney. I submit though, that my situation stemmed from similarlary conflicted roles and codes of conduct. Think about it: a residential appraiser is making $300-$400 on an appraisal; the salesperson is making as much as $12,000 on the sale. Practically speaking, the appraiser will lose his reputation if he/she were to inflate value; the salesperson is undoubtedly praised by fetching the highest possible price. I assure you that appraisers are bound my much stricter regulations and standards in reporting value than are salespeople. Actually, I’m not even sure what salespeople are reporting when they do a CMA. Unfortunately, I think most sellers believe they’re reporting market value. They are not!
There is no easy answer or quick fix to the problem of appraiser pressure. I just hope that awareness of the problem might give pause to salespeople, buyers/sellers, and lenders the next time appraised value doesn’t meet their expectations. The appraisers are reporting market value. They’re not sabotaging sales.
Posted by Matt Barber on November 12th, 2007 | Permalink | Comment (1)
My interest was piqued by the RTD’s article on Friday entitled Sprawl, ‘hard to serve with transit’. The gist is that public transit cannot effectively serve areas of low density (4 units per acre or less). I decided to scan the Henrico County 2026 Land Use Map for areas of higher densities. The County offers four such zoning categories: Urban Residential (6.8 dua), Multi-family (19.8 dua), Traditional Neighborhood Development (density unknown, but multi-story residential is promoted), and Urban Mixed Use (density unknown, but presumably high from its description). At random, I chose the Urban Mixed Use category, to scan the Land Use Map, and identified very few areas–the obvious ones being along the James River, i.e., Rockett’s Landing, Wilton Farm, and the other PUDs in the east end. In the West End though, I identified only four areas with the Urban Mixed Use land use designation. Three are in the heart of Short Pump, which makes sense. The fourth is Regency Mall, and the 12-acre site across Starling Drive which is proposed for development with a BJ’s Wholesale. A few comments: on the surface, it makes sense that the West End shouldn’t be inundated by Urban Mixed Use developments. Short Pump is probably the most logical place for high-density mixed-use development. I have a problem though with the County presenting a Land Use plan with relatively focused areas for such development, and then scrapping it for a big box retailer. What’s the point in even having the category? The UBU zone is exactly what the RTD article says is needed for public transportation. Unless Regency Mall is turned into a mixed-use develompent in the next decade or so, then the 2026 Land Use plan already shows a serious deficiency in my estimation.
Posted by Matt Barber on November 10th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
Old ranch dwelling…make way for a new 2-story office building. The Henrico BOS approved the rezoning from R-1 to O-2C for construction of a 2-story 8,700 square foot office building. Nice.
Posted by Matt Barber on November 7th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (2)
The Henrico County BOS granted conditional rezoning approval to the Rebkee Company to construct a 13,013 square foot CVS on a 2.33-acre site at the northeast corner of Patterson Avenue and Lauderdale Drive. Excellent news in that the old gas station is an eyesore and will be replaced by a useful development. I can’t wait to see what they’re paying for the site.
Posted by Matt Barber on November 7th, 2007 | Permalink | Comment (1)
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services cut the ratings for D.R. Horton, Lennar, and Pulte homes to “junk” status. Ryan Homes was left untouched.
http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071102/homebuilders_ratings.html?.v=2
Beazer homes just suspended its dividend and intends to lay off 25% of its workforce.
Where is the bottom?
Posted by Matt Barber on November 6th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
The 12.5-acre site across Starling Drive from Regency Mall is proposed for development with a 117,286 square foot BJ’s Wholesale with gas pumpers. When I first heard this, all I could think about was how the 2-lane Starling Drive could handle the traffic. Indeed a Traffic Impact Study is actually what is holding up the approval process with Henrico County. Besides the traffic, I suppose it might help improve the health of Regency Mall. The giant purple Disco Sports must be pleased.
Posted by Matt Barber on November 6th, 2007 | Permalink | Comment (1)
Richmond Rapport is pleased to announce a special event unique in the Richmond MSA. On Friday, December 7th, we present you with a panel of real-life real estate success stories. Please RSVP to reserve your seat at the Richmond Associaton of Realtors to hear from a cross-section of Richmond’s real estate elite speak about how they “made it”. We have commitments from Richmond’s top Realtors, appraisers, developers, and more. A catered lunch will be served at 11am. A Q&A session with the panel will begin at noon. Admission is $10, but will be waived in lieu of 2 unopened toys which will be donated to the Richmond Toys For Tots program. Seating is limited, so please send an email to richmondrapport@gmail.com reserve your spot.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 30th, 2007 | Permalink | Comment (1)
Richmond Rapport is pleased to announce its November social. The event is sponsored by Southern Trust Mortgage, and will include an open bar from 4-7pm. The venue is The Townes at Cary Place , a development by StyleCraft Homes and East West Partners. The event is open to all young real estate professionals in the Richmond MSA. So please come out and have a drink, meet other Realtors, appraisers, developers, bankers, engineers, and architects with whom you will do business for years to come. Admission is $5 and includes an open bar and appetizers.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 30th, 2007 | Permalink | Comment (1)
Tis the season for political fundraising, or at least reporting the results of one’s efforts in that arena. Popular among journalists, national and local alike, is publicizing from whence candidates’ funds have come. The Times Dispatch has published several articles (1 and 2) on campaign contributions from developers in the Richmond MSA. I’m pleased to see that today’s paper has an article on contributions from conservationists. It’s probably naive to think that conservation groups can compete financially on the level with large developers. But given the relatively small dollar figure contributions in the Richmond MSA races, it appears that they can. Perhaps just as important, conservation groups undoubtedly come with more fervor and passion than businessmen. I’m sure every municipality has its opposition group to developers, but this Hanover group certainly seems to get its message across. So does this group in Fluvanna County (not in the Richmond MSA I know). Speaking as a professional who earns a living off of real estate development, I often cringe at the spurious arguments made by conservation groups and developers alike. Speaking as a human being who enjoys the natural resources of our Commonwealth, I applaud the point-counterpoint and the democratic process. So hopefully our political candidates are lobbied by balanced representation of their constituents with respect to land use.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 30th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (3)
The Times Dispatch published an article today on funding conservation easements in the Commonwealth. Conservation easements are popular among wealthy individuals in rural areas who (1) support land preservation and (2) benefit from tax credits. That is not to say that a rural farmer who makes $30,000 per year wouldn’t benefit from placing his land under easement. He certainly could by selling the credits. In my experience, albeit limited, it is the higher net-worth individuals who are participating in the conservation programs.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 25th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
This is the fifth and final post on the 17th Annual Real Estate Trends conference organized by VCU and held at the Richmond Convention Center on October 9, 2007. It was my second time attending, and it was much more informative than the last. The final speaker was Bret Wilkerson, CEO of Property & Portfolio Research (www.ppr.info). Mr. Wilkerson presented a wealth of information, most of which is not easily disseminated without a master’s degree in economics. That said, most of his presentation revolved around the slides/graphs which, once one takes the time to study them, are very informative. I have included several of them in this post.

So what does this chart command us to do? I guess it orders investors to make real estate the 2nd or 3rd largest portion of their investment portfolios. Seriously though, I’m surprised that real estate doesn’t show a stronger return in the 5- and 10-year columns.

How about this one? I read that Richmond is perhaps building too much retail space.
This presentation didn’t include much on the office market in Richmond. Here is a graph with a projection for the industrial market.
So Mr. Wilkerson is projecting 15% NOI growth for industrial property in Richmond over the next 5 quarters…seems reasonable. I interpret the cap rate side of the graph to say that Richmond’s industrial property will command cap rates almost 50 basis points higher than the national average.
That’s it for my summary of the VCU Real Estate Trends conference. If you would like additional information on any of the speakers, I’m happy to provide it.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 25th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
When you think of real estate professionals, who comes to mind? Realtors/brokers, builders, developers, appraisers, bankers…probably in that order. Here’s an interesting twist: http://dabneyproperties.com/.
I happened to run into a couple of clients of Dabney Properties and they both reported excellent accommodations and service. I’m not promoting this company by any means. I just thought it is a creative way to earn a living in the real estate industry.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 22nd, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
The City of Richmond just cracked down on water consumption. It joins Chesterfield and Hanover in the battle against drought. Henrico County votes on Tuesday on whether or not to impose mandatory conservation.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 20th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
Tree Hill Farm is what Mr. Rue is talking about. My knowledge of the project is limited to what I’ve read on the developer’s website, and other online sources. But it looks pretty amazing. An adjacent property owner said it best in a recent Times Dispatch article: “Varina has been discovered.” No kidding…Rockett’s (1,500 units), Tree Hill Farm (2,770 units), Wilton Farm (3,209 units), plus Curle’s Neck are all going to be HUGE. I’m also aware of one other MAJOR development in the immediate area which would add nearly 2,000 additional units to be built by a national builder. Seriously, this area of Henrico is going to explode.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 19th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
This is the fourth of several posts on the 17th Annual Real Estate Trends conference organized by VCU and held at the Richmond Convention Center on October 9, 2007. It was my second time attending, and it was much more informative than the last. There were five speakers, the fourth whom I highlight in this post. Harrison Rue is the Executive Director of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District which advises Charlottesville, Albemarle, Fluvanna, and Louisa counties (among others) on land use and transportation. He presented information on intelligent development and land use. Personally, I found Mr. Rue’s presentation to be the most engaging of the five speakers. I had heard him speak several times previously, and I’m constantly impressed by his vision. I’m not going to pretend to fully grasp everything he has to say about smart growth. Some transportation and tax implications are beyond me. But when I do “get” what he has to say, I wonder why more people don’t see things the way he does.
His presentation, and his job in general, instructs municipalities and developers how to build communities which:
- streamline cost and target investment dollars
- support pedestrian access between residences and commercial space
- incorporate public transportation, thereby reducing traffic
I urge anyone considering developing in the Charlottesville MSA to contact Mr. Rue. Any tidbit of information that he could pass on is invaluable.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 19th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
This is the first of several posts on the 17th Annual Real Estate Trends conference organized by VCU and held at the Richmond Convention Center on October 9, 2007. It was my second time attending, and it was much more informative than the last. There were five speakers, the third whom I will highlight in this post. Mark Rubin is Senior Advisor to Governor Tim Kaine. He presented information on land use and transportation in the Commonwealth. Here are some highlights from his presentation:
SB 373 (2006) - Transfer of Development Rights. This bill allows municipalities to set up an system to allow for transferring development rights from one area to another area, presumably to direct growth/development to the appropriate areas.
HB 2500 (2007) - Expansion of Conditional Zoning. This bill granted most municipalities the right to accept cash proffers. While most of you might think this is obvious, I present you with the following graphic:
Notice anything odd?
HB 3202 (2007) - Urban Development Areas. This bill requires 67 high growth localities to establish Urban Development Areas with compact densities of at least 4 units per acre. It mandates New Urbanism principles in these development areas. This bill also allowed additional municipalities to impose road impact fees in addition to base cash proffers.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 18th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
This is the second of several posts on the 17th Annual Real Estate Trends conference organized by VCU and held at the Richmond Convention Center on October 9, 2007. There were five speakers, the second of whom I will highlight in this post. Ken Powell works for Stone & Youngberg to facilitate land-secured bonds, i.e., CDAs for developers and municipalities. His presentation defined a Community Development Authority (CDA) as:
…a public instrumentality authorized by the City Council or County Board of Supervisors…for the purpose of providing public infrastructure.
They are established to finance and construct roads, bridges, and other infrastructure needed to serve the municipality as a result of the development. The CDA is basically a bond secured by the land which the municipality authorizes to develop the project. The municipality is not accountable for repayment of the bond. The bond is repaid by special tax assessments. Google will provide you with more than enough resources to educate you on CDAs. Below are some interesting cases in the Commonwealth handled by Stone & Youngberg.
The Farms of New Kent, 30 miles east of Richmond (New Kent County), September 2006
$85,666,000 bond amount
1,450 age-restricted units / 300 estate lots / 450 sfd / 100 resort cottages / 830,000 sf commercial / 18-hold golf course / winery, vineyards, polo, farmers market
Developer - Boddie-Noell Enterprises, Republic Land, and K. Hovnanian
Use of Proceeds: road, water, and wastewater infrastructure
Reynolds Crossing (Henrico County), May 2007
$14,594,000 bond amount
250-room Westin Hotel / 480,000 sf office / 170,000 sf restaurant and retail
Developer - Reynolds Holdings, LLC
Use of Proceeds: road improvements, water and sewer infrastructure
The Shops and White Oak Village (Henrico County), October 2007
$23,870,000 bond amount
870,000 sf open-air retail / 150-room Hyatt
Developer - Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
Use of Proceeds: earthworks, off-ramps, parking, traffic lights, water and sewer infrastructure
I find CDAs particularly interesting because I’m working (slowly) on a large (potentially 900 acres) mixed-use development in Fluvanna County. This property — and Fluvanna in general — almost certainly needs a CDA to be developed properly. So while many at the VCU conference may have found Mr. Powell’s presentation boring, I was extremely interested.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 16th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
This is the first of several posts on the 17th Annual Real Estate Trends conference organized by VCU and held at the Richmond Convention Center on October 9, 2007. It was my second time attending, and it was much more informative than the last. There were five speakers, the first of whom I will highlight in this post. Mark Zandi is the Chief Economist and co-founder of Moody’s Economy.com, Inc. His presentation was largely on how the sub-prime real estate market is impacting the national economy. Instead of summarizing his findings, I will simply insert the charts and graphs which he provided. These three graphs don’t necessarily relate to one another. I simply thought they were the most informative.
If you accept a positive corellation between credit risk and the TED spread, I think the above graph puts today’s credit risks into historical perspective.
Hooray for Richmond….

Boo for Richmond
For those of you in the real estate business who haven’t attended a VCU Trends conference, you should. I would like to see more attention given to Richmond or even the Commonwealth, but overall its a great event. There is ample time before the speakers, and between sessions for you to meet other people too.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 15th, 2007 | Permalink | Comment (1)
Virginiabusiness.com has published an article in its October issue which highlights several of the largest construction projects in the Commonwealth. Of the 9 projects included in the article, four are in Richmond:
Westchester Commons / Watkins Center in Chesterfield County, $165 million
1.3 million square feet of retail
2 million square feet of office and industrial space
1,600 residential units
The Shops at White Oak Village in Henrico County, $161 million
900,000 square feet of retail space
Miller & Rhoads Renovation in the City of Richmond, $95 million
250 hotel rooms
130+ residential condominium units
Meadwestvaco Corporate Headquarters in the City of Richmond, $80 million
300,000 square foot build-to-suit office building
Posted by Matt Barber on October 13th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
The Richmond Times Dispatch published a short article on Richmond home sales. Highlights:
The Richmond MSA saw a nearly 20% decline in year-over-year home sales for September.
The average sale price rose nearly 4% to $276,438.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 13th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
Contributors to the Rapport blog will periodically communicate interesting market data (sales/lease). This is the first such post.
I was on what used to be the eastern periphery of the VCU Monroe Park campus today appraising some property, and inspecting two recent sales. The first is the sale of 600-606 West Grace Street, more commonly identified as the BP-Amoco on the corner of Belvidere and West Grace Street. The 0.35-acre site has a 456 square foot c-store kiosk and a 302 square foot office/storage building. The four 10,000-gallon underground gas tanks provide fuel for six 3-hose dispensers and one 2-hose dispenser. The property sold September 17, 2007 for $1,100,000. While some value was added by the existing fuel infrastructure, the $1,100,000 equates to $71.19 per square foot of land area….pretty crazy for the City of Richmond (outside of the CBD). The new owner reportedly will demolish most of the existing improvements and install new equipment to operate an Uppy’s Convenience Store. What I really find interesting about the sale though, is that VCU didn’t buy it. This property is an important part of the Monroe Park campus master plan, and it is transferring hands in the private sector.
The second sale I also find interesting, chiefly because I find infill developent in the City so interesting. It’s the sale of 114-118 South Belvidere Street. the 19,000 square foot site includes a vacant residential shell building with little to no value. I haven’t verified the details of the sale, so I don’t know if it will be remodeled or demolished…let’s hope for the latter. The site is immediately north of the 7-Eleven and I-195. It was listed for over a year for $1,250,000 ($65.79/sf), and sold August 2, 2007 for $1,000,000 ($52.63 per square foot of land area).
That’s all for now.
Posted by Matt Barber on October 12th, 2007 | Permalink | Comment (1)
“Copyright for Professionals Seminar”
Presented by The Appraisal Alliance/VAR
Instructor: Tim Vining, MAI
Friday, September 21st – Virginia Association of REALTORS®, Glen Allen, VA
Registration: 8:30 a.m.
Seminar: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (lunch included with registration)
(qualifies for appraisal continuing education; pending real estate continuing education)
The Copyright for Professionals Seminar provides professionals with the understanding of what copyright is and how to protect their work. The Seminar also provides information on how to avoid infringing on another professional’s work product.
The objective is to orient the participants to the basics of copyright protection, demystify the process, eliminate misconceptions about copyrights and to provide the participant with the means to enforce their rights.
Please call 804.264.5033 to register!
–
Membership Meeting:
Special Guest 2007 AI PresidentTerry Dunkin
September 25, 2007
To register online (paying with credit card) simply click these links:
Chicken Entree: http://www.appraisalinstitute.org/education/VirginiaCommonwealth.aspx
Swordfish Entree: http://www.appraisalinstitute.org/education/VirginiaCommonwealth.aspx
To register through the chapter office (paying with a check) simply fill out the attached registration form and fax it to 804.377.0941.
Posted by Carter Snipes on September 21st, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)
Wells Fargo, Chaplin, Qureshi & Hoyle, ULI, & Rapport Present:
Party@Creeks Edge
(If you missed the first one, be sure to mark your calendar!)
Free Drinks, Poolside Venue
and Great People!
WHEN Wed. Sept. 19th, 2007
TIME 5pm-8pm
WHERE Creeks Edge @Stony Point
TICKETS $7 at the door $5 if you bring a new member
DIRECTIONS: Creeks Edge is located directly in front of Dicks Sporting Goods at Stony Point Mall. GO directly through the security gates via the GUEST ENTRANCE. Park back by the clubhouse.
Special Thanks to Wells Fargo Home Loans & Chaplin, Qureshi & Hoyle for sponsoring this event!!!
Posted by Carter Snipes on August 28th, 2007 | Permalink | Comments (0)